Guru's 1998 Smallworld Football Player Stats

1998 Smallworld Football Player Stats
Updated for games played through week 9

Position:

All

Defense

Sort By:

The "Bye week" column (2nd from right) indicates the week of the 1998 season that the player's team has a bye.
Ratios for team defenses are adjusted to reflect only the marginal cost and marginal SWP vs. the cheapest team defense, which is currently Arizona. Also, check out the special table of Team Defense averages vs. Opposing Offense.

A red price indicates a low price for the year, while a green price denotes a high price for the year.
HOME TEAM is listed in capital letters in team/opp column.


                                    Oct 28   Last                            Last
                                     Price  Price   YTD   SWP   SWP    SWP week's   1997 Games 
Pos Name                  Team/Opp  ($000) Change   SWP   /$m    /G   /m/G    SWP  SWP/G played
Def Oakland                oak/BAL   3,400  1,070 -2300   144    61     18   -258   -563   8
Def Miami                  MIA/ind   5,690   -130 -2341    79    56     10   -513   -444   8
Def Kansas City            kan/SEA   5,280     20 -2586    39    26      5   -451   -321   8
Def Dallas                 DAL/nyg   5,400     30 -2582    39    26      5    -35   -401   8
Def Seattle                SEA/kan   5,920     10 -2676    19    14      2   -528   -422   8
Def San Diego              sdg/DEN   4,520     80 -2729    13     8      2      0   -499   8
Def Arizona                ARI/was   2,650   -460 -2790     0     0      0   -110   -499   8
Def Pittsburgh             PIT/gnb   5,680    -30 -2890   -18   -13     -2   -701   -360   8
Def New England            NWE/atl   4,970   -170 -2884   -19   -12     -2   -380   -380   8
Def Tampa Bay              TAM/ten   5,040    -90 -2948   -31   -20     -4   -515   -353   8
Def New York J             NYJ/buf   3,670     30 -2917   -35   -16     -4   -229   -423   8
Def San Francisco          SFO/car   9,530    -90 -3131   -36   -43     -4   -577   -267   8
Def Green Bay              gnb/PIT   5,480    -50 -3106   -58   -40     -7   -306   -362   8
Def New York G             nyg/DAL   7,030    -10 -3252   -66   -58     -8   -490   -325   8
Def New Orleans            nor/MIN   6,040     10 -3348   -92   -70    -12   -406   -371   8
Def Buffalo                buf/NYJ   4,810      0 -3241   -94   -56    -12   -461   -442   8
Def Denver                 DEN/sdg   5,730     10 -3355   -99   -71    -12   -567   -357   8
Def Atlanta                atl/NWE   4,570    -70 -3326  -117   -67    -15   -322   -432   8
Def Minnesota              MIN/nor   3,280      0 -3182  -120   -49    -15   -648   -476   8
Def Chicago                CHI/stl   5,360     10 -3440  -121   -81    -15      0   -461   8
Def St. Louis              stl/CHI   5,590      0 -3570  -140   -98    -17   -749   -407   8
Def Tennessee              ten/TAM   4,530     10 -3495  -156   -88    -19   -576   -412   8
Def Detroit                det/PHI   4,810     10 -3652  -179  -108    -22   -249   -403   8
Def Jacksonville           JAC/cin   3,880   -180 -3550  -196   -95    -24   -302   -415   8
Def Baltimore              BAL/oak   3,670    -60 -3608  -223  -102    -28   -749   -446   8
                                    Oct 28   Last                            Last
                                     Price  Price   YTD   SWP   SWP    SWP week's   1997 Games 
Pos Name                  Team/Opp  ($000) Change   SWP   /$m    /G   /m/G    SWP  SWP/G played
Def Philadelphia           PHI/det   4,910    -20 -3909  -228  -140    -28   -614   -441   8
Def Indianapolis           ind/MIA   5,030      0 -4452  -330  -208    -41   -525   -461   8
Def Carolina               car/SFO   3,620    -10 -4221  -395  -179    -49   -314   -423   8
Def Washington             was/ARI   4,360      0 -4772  -455  -248    -57   -359   -388   8
Def Cincinnati             cin/JAC   2,720    -10 -4838  -753  -256    -94   -617   -522   8

Return to RotoGuru Menu

This report is based upon data which the Guru believes to be reliable, but for which no assurances of accuracy can be made. Users who discover suspected errors are requested to report them to the Guru via email.